Oink.... I'm speaking my mind.. have another bon bon girls!I didn't expect to post this soon but I have been referred to as being a chauvinist P..
- The word does not require a judgment that the chauvinist is right or wrong in his opinion, only that he is blind and unreasoning in coming to it, ignoring any facts which might temper his fervor. In modern use, however, it is often used pejoratively to imply that the chauvinist is both unreasoning and wrong.
Leave it to a woman to go and stir up trouble with a system that was already working. Based on facts look how they are screwing up the congress. If you don't do as I say we're taking away funding so there........oh be serious, but men are blind ignorant and one sided give me a break.
Male chauvinism
Male chauvinism is a term used to describe the belief that males are superior to females. The word "chauvinist" was originally used to describe one who has a fanatical loyalty in one's country. The word was later applied by the "women's liberation movement" in the 1960s and used to describe men who believe women are inferior, speak to them as inferiors, or treat them negatively based solely upon their gender. The slur "chauvinist pig" has been reclaimed by some men as a jocular personal rebuttal or tolerance of such accusations.
Let me straignten the record I don't think we are superior to women, I know it.Female chauvinism
Female chauvinism can refer to two things. It can be the belief that females are superior to males. It can also refer to women who replicate male chauvinism and sexist stereotypes.
According to misandry researchers Nathanson and Young, modern feminist theory has chauvinistic elements. Nathanson and Young claim that some feminists assert that women are innately different from men and superior to men and that knowledge created by women is superior to that created by men.[1]
So called "women's ways of knowing" which are said to rely on subjective intuition and emotional connection are considered superior to so-called "men's ways of knowing" which are said to be based upon objective evidence and reasonable contemplation.[2] Nathan and Young say, "in one way or another, feminist espistemologies are radically subjective. They refer to 'women's ways of knowing' as distinct and opposed to those of men."[citation needed]
Go ahead women you go on thinking you don't need us men, see how far that gets ya. Oh yeah
don't go looking at them the wrong way next thing those women will be complaining sexual harassment, well last I looked the Lord gave us two eyes to look with and women to look at and this is Democracy, will have to many rules on the book. If you don't want us looking dress like Hillary Clinton , she covers so much even the hubby isn't looking.
For those who want reference-
